The GTX 1060 was once our best graphics card choice for this particular category, and it still puts up a pretty decent fight over on High settings. Let's start where both cards are most comfortable: good old 1920x1080 gaming. Still, with all that in mind, let's get to those lovely charts. It doesn't deviate from Nvidia's reference specification for the GTX 1660 Super, either, so these results should be taken as more of a baseline experience rather than the absolute pinnacle of 1660 Super performance. The Zotac GTX 1660 Super, on the other hand, is very much at the other end of the spectrum, and is currently one of the cheapest 1660 Super cards you can currently buy. As a result, my GTX 1060 are probably more of a best case scenario for this type of card. The latter isn't actually available to buy any more (and hasn't been for some time), but when it was available it was one of the faster GTX 1060 cards you could buy. The games include Metro Exodus, The Witcher III, Final Fantasy XV, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Total War: Three Kingdoms, Assassin’s Creed Odyssey, Monster Hunter: World and Forza Horizon 4.įor this particular test, I've used Zotac's GeForce GTX 1660 Super Twin Fan and the Asus GeForce GTX 1060 OC 9Gbps Edition (6GB). To test each card, I paired them with my Intel Core i5-8600K CPU and 16GB of Corsair Vengeance 2133MHz RAM and put them through my general benchmarking suite, taking an average frame rate from either their own built-in benchmarking tools or from my own repeated manual gameplay tests. ![]() Just like my GTX 1660 vs 1660 Super and GTX 1660 Super vs 1660 Ti comparison pieces this week, the aim here is to see how well each card runs at a variety of resolutions and graphics settings - primarily, 1920x10x1440. Watch on YouTube GTX 1060 vs 1660 Super: How we test
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |